Recommendations for Selecting Endoscope Camera Modules

I. Evaluation Dimensions for Module Selection

1. Size and Structural Compatibility

Conditions for selecting the steel shell-free version (1.05×1.05×5.0mm):

· Extremely limited device integration space and high weight sensitivity

· No risk of mechanical impact in the application environment

· Suitable for scenarios with strict lightweight requirements, such as disposable medical devices and end-effectors of micro-robots.

Conditions for selecting the steel shell version (Φ2.0×6.0mm):

· Risks of friction, collision or pressure changes in the application environment, requiring additional mechanical protection

· Suitable for durability-demanding scenarios such as industrial pipeline inspection, reusable medical tools and outdoor security.

2. Optical Performance Matching

Optical requirements suitable for this module:

· Need for a wide-angle field of view (120° diagonal) to maximize the observation range in narrow spaces

· Working distance concentrated within 5–50mm

· Moderate requirements for distortion control (＜11% TV distortion acceptable)

· No need for ultra-high resolution (400×400 pixels meet basic inspection needs)

Situations where other models are recommended:

· Need for higher resolution (＞1MP) for detailed discrimination

· Working distance beyond 50mm

· Strict requirements for image distortion (＜5%)

· Need for special spectral imaging (e.g., infrared, fluorescence)

3. Environmental Adaptability Evaluation

Recommended application environments:

· Wide temperature variations (-20℃~70℃)

· Space-constrained areas where supplementary lighting systems cannot be installed

· Requirements for long-term continuous operation

· Industrial sites with vibration or slight impact

Situations requiring cautious use:

· Long-term exposure to high humidity (＞40%RH) environments

· Presence of strong electromagnetic interference

· Need for use in fully waterproof or high-pressure environments

II. Application Scenario Selection Guide

1. Medical Endoscopy Field

Recommended configuration: Steel shell version + medical-grade cablesTypical applications:

· Otorhinolaryngology inspection: The steel shell version is recommended to prevent damage caused by accidental movement of patients

· Dental root canal treatment: The steel shell-free version is easier to access narrow root canals

· Minimally invasive surgery assistance: Select the appropriate version according to the space of surgical instruments

2. Industrial Inspection Field

Recommended configuration: Steel shell version + industrial-grade protective cablesApplication suggestions:

· Pipeline inspection: Applicable to pipelines with diameter ≥Φ2mm; prioritize the steel shell version

· Precision machinery inspection: Select the corresponding version based on the size of the inspection space

· Electronic manufacturing inspection: The steel shell-free version is suitable for accessing gaps between tiny components

3. Scientific Research and Special Applications

Configuration suggestions: Customize according to the experimental environmentNotes:

· Consider disinfection compatibility for biological experiments

· Evaluate the impact of heat generation for long-term observation

· Confirm optical compatibility when used in special media

III. Integration Technical Recommendations

1. Power Supply and Signal Design

· Use a regulated power supply (4.8-5.2V)

· Consider signal enhancement when the signal cable length exceeds 2 meters

· Reserve a 30% power consumption margin

2. Mechanical Integration Key Points

· A dedicated fixing structure must be designed for the steel shell-free version

· The steel shell version can be installed with standard threads

· Reserve a 0.1mm installation tolerance

3. Optical Adjustment Suggestions

· Perform focus calibration after installation

· LED brightness can be adjusted via PWM

· Conduct imaging tests in the final application environment

IV. Cost and Maintenance Considerations

1. Initial Investment Evaluation

· The steel shell-free version is more cost-effective, suitable for disposable or low-cost devices

· The steel shell version features better durability, suitable for reusable scenarios

2. Long-term Operating Costs

· The LED lifespan is approximately 10,000 hours; a replacement plan should be considered

· Cables are vulnerable parts; it is recommended to keep spare parts in stock

· Specialized tools are required for cleaning and maintenance

V. Selection Decision-making Process

1. Clarify demand priorities: Rank size, durability, cost and performance by importance

2. Verify environmental adaptability: Conduct sample tests in simulated real-world environments

3. Verify system integration: Test compatibility with the main control system

4. Conduct cost-benefit analysis: Comprehensively evaluate initial investment and long-term maintenance costs

VI. Comparative Analysis with Alternative Solutions

Compared with similar endoscope camera modules on the market, this product has differentiated advantages in multiple key dimensions, with specific comparisons as follows:

1. Size Comparison

This module offers industry-leading miniaturized packaging (minimum 1.05mm steel shell-free version). Compared with conventional modules with a diameter of Φ3-5mm, it can operate in narrower pipelines or cavities. For applications with extremely strict space constraints, this module should be the top choice; for scenarios with ample operating space, conventional-sized modules can be considered for larger imaging sensors or stronger mechanical structures.

2. Field of View Comparison

Equipped with a 120° ultra-wide field of view, this product is significantly superior to standard modules with a 60-90° field of view. In narrow environments, this greatly reduces the frequency of lens movement and improves inspection efficiency. For scenarios requiring wide coverage in a single shot, this module has obvious advantages; for local fine observation, modules with a standard field of view may be more suitable.

3. Environmental Adaptability Comparison

Supporting stable operation in a wide temperature range of -20℃~70℃, it outperforms most modules only suitable for normal temperature (0-50℃). For application sites with large temperature fluctuations or extreme temperature conditions (e.g., outdoor, cold storage, high-temperature workshops), this module is a more reliable choice; for constant temperature environments, more cost-effective normal-temperature models can be considered.

4. Comprehensive Cost Comparison

This module achieves an excellent balance between miniaturization and wide-angle performance, making it an economical professional solution. For budget-constrained projects that do not require ultra-high resolution or special imaging functions, this product offers outstanding cost performance; for high-end functions such as 4K imaging, fluorescence or spectral analysis, higher-tier and higher-cost modules are required.

Summary

This module is most suitable for application scenarios with limited space, wide-angle observation needs, variable ambient temperatures and constrained budgets. If the requirements lean toward ultra-high resolution, long working distance, special imaging or strict protection levels, it is recommended to evaluate more professional high-end models. During selection, trade-offs should be made among size, field of view, environmental tolerance and cost according to the priority of specific application scenarios.