Trade-Offs in Choosing Steel Shells for Endoscopic Camera Modules
You are here: Home » About Us » News » Knowledge » Trade-Offs in Choosing Steel Shells for Endoscopic Camera Modules

Trade-Offs in Choosing Steel Shells for Endoscopic Camera Modules

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2025-09-28      Origin: Site

Inquire

wechat sharing button
line sharing button
twitter sharing button
facebook sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button

Endoscopic camera modules, as the "visual core" of minimally invasive medical procedures and precision industrial inspections, require their structural design to balance imaging performance, environmental adaptability, and application-specific needs. The steel shell, an optional protective component around the module, is not a simple "yes or no" choice; instead, it demands a comprehensive assessment based on the module’s inherent parameters, operating environment, and functional objectives. Taking the OCHFA10 CMOS Sensor USB2.0 Medical Endoscopic Camera Module as a specific case, this article analyzes the core trade-off logic between using and not using a steel shell from the perspectives of technical characteristics and scenario adaptability.

I. The Core Functions of Steel Shells in Endoscopic Camera Modules

Before discussing the trade-offs, it is necessary to clarify the functional positioning of the steel shell—it is not a "mandatory component" of the module, but an "enhancement solution" for specific needs. Its core functions focus on three aspects:
  • Mechanical Protection: Resists external friction, impact, or extrusion to protect the module’s internal CMOS sensor, lens, and built-in 0402 LED.

  • Enhanced Sterilization Compatibility: The material of the steel shell withstands repeated high-temperature steam sterilization, ETO (Ethylene Oxide) sterilization, or STERRAD sterilization, reducing the degradation of the module’s IP68 waterproof rating caused by the aging of the module’s base material during sterilization.

  • Improved Structural Stability: The steel shell secures the assembly precision between the module and external devices (e.g., endoscope probes), preventing deviations in the 86°×86° field of view (FOV) and image blurring caused by vibration—making it particularly suitable for long-term reusable scenarios.

II. Endoscopic Camera Modules with Steel Shells: Advantages Focus on "Durability and Environmental Adaptability," with Compromises on "Minor Dimensional Changes and Cost"

As medical-grade modules, endoscopic camera modules have core parameters (ultra-compact size of 2.6×1.6mm, low power consumption of 82.2 mW, and medical-grade sterilization compatibility) that provide a foundation for steel shell integration. However, these parameters also mean that the "benefits" and "limitations" of using a steel shell must align precisely with the application scenario.

1. Core Advantages of Steel Shells: Suitable for "High Reusability and High Wear" Scenarios

  • Upgraded Mechanical Protection for Extended Reusable Lifespan: If the endoscopic camera module is used in reusable endoscopes (e.g., gastroscopes or colonoscopes for repeated use in gastroenterology), the steel shell can directly resist mucosal friction in human body cavities and water impact during device cleaning, preventing scratches on the optical coating of the 2mm-diameter lens. In contrast, without a steel shell, the biocompatible plastic housing of the module tends to develop tiny scratches after more than 10 cycles of sterilization and cleaning, which may impair imaging clarity.

  • Enhanced Sterilization Reliability to Reduce Safety Risks: In medical scenarios, endoscopic camera modules require ETO sterilization, STERRAD sterilization, or 134°C steam sterilization to ensure sterility. The steel shell can isolate the module’s internal circuits from potential corrosion by sterilizing agents (e.g., the aging effect of low-temperature plasma on plastics) while maintaining the long-term stability of the IP68 waterproof rating. Especially for endoscopes reused more than 30 times, the risk of sterilization failure for endoscopic camera modules with steel shells can be reduced by approximately 40%.

  • Structural Rigidity for Harsh Industrial Environments: If the OCHFA10 is used for industrial pipeline inspection (e.g., cooling holes in aero-engines or narrow-diameter pipelines in chemical engineering), the steel shell can resist impacts from metal burrs in pipelines and high-temperature effects (≤80°C in industrial environments). This prevents blurred dynamic imaging (at 400×400 pixels at 90 fps) caused by module vibration, ensuring real-time detection of micro-cracks and particle defects.

2. Limitations of Steel Shells: Compromises on "Dimensional Compactness" and "Cost"

  • Minor Dimensional Increase, Potentially Limiting Integration in Ultra-Narrow Spaces: The ultra-compact 2.6×1.6mm size of the endoscopic camera module is its core advantage for adapting to ultra-narrow scenarios such as coronary stent navigation and pediatric endoscopes. After adding a steel shell, the outer diameter of the module increases by 0.3–0.5mm (depending on the steel shell thickness), which may prevent the original 2mm-diameter probe from passing through blood vessels with a diameter of <2.5mm, losing the advantage of ultra-minimally invasive procedures.

  • Slight Increases in Cost and Heat Dissipation Challenges: Precision machining of medical-grade steel shells (e.g., inner wall polishing to avoid lens obstruction) increases the cost of a single module by 15%–20%. Additionally, while the steel shell does not affect the heat dissipation of the OCHFA10’s 82.2 mW low power consumption (the module itself generates minimal heat), during extremely long-term use (>2 hours), the temperature rise is 0.5–1°C higher than that without a steel shell, requiring minor optimizations to the heat dissipation path during design.

III. Endoscopic Camera Modules Without Steel Shells: Advantages Focus on "Ultimate Compactness and Cost Optimization," with Risks in "Protection and Lifespan"

Endoscopic camera modules without steel shells essentially "maximize the advantages of their inherent parameters" but require compromises in protection and lifespan. They are more suitable for "space-sensitive and low-reusability" scenarios.

1. Core Advantages of No Steel Shell: Targeting "Ultra-Minimally Invasive and Low-Cost" Needs

  • Retaining Ultimate Compactness for Ultra-Narrow Spaces: Without a steel shell, the endoscopic camera module maintains its 2.6×1.6mm size and 2mm-diameter lens—this is critical for its use in coronary angioscopes (with blood vessel diameters of 2–3mm) and pediatric bronchoscopes (requiring probes <2.5mm in diameter). In such cases, the "dimensional advantage" of not using a steel shell directly determines whether "minimally invasive, trauma-free" procedures can be achieved, prioritizing this over mechanical protection.

  • Cost Reduction for Disposable Scenarios: If used in disposable endoscopes (e.g., single-use laryngoscopes during the pandemic or disposable intestinal examination scopes), repeated sterilization and long-term reusability are unnecessary. Omitting the steel shell eliminates steel processing costs and simplifies the assembly process, reducing the cost of a single module by more than 15%—aligning with the "cost control" requirements for disposable medical devices.

  • More Direct Heat Dissipation for Long-Term Low-Power Scenarios: The 82.2 mW low power consumption generates minimal heat. Without a steel shell, heat can be directly conducted from the module’s housing to external devices, resulting in a 10%–15% higher heat dissipation efficiency compared to modules with steel shells. For surgeries requiring continuous operation for over 1 hour (e.g., laparoscopic surgeries), this avoids potential tissue irritation caused by slight temperature rises.

2. Limitations of No Steel Shell: Protection and Lifespan Depend on "Scenario Friendliness"

  • Weak Mechanical Protection, Limited to Low-Wear Environments: Without a steel shell, if the endoscopic camera module is used in industrial pipeline inspections (where pipelines contain burrs or welding slag), the 2mm-diameter lens is prone to scratches, leading to dark spots in imaging. Even in medical scenarios, when used in gastroscopes (which need to pass through narrow esophageal sections), mucosal friction may wear the module’s housing, compromising its IP68 waterproof rating (e.g., water ingress during cleaning damaging circuits).

  • Shorter Sterilization Lifespan, Unsuitable for High Reusability: Without a steel shell, the biocompatible plastic housing of the endoscopic camera module may show slight aging after 5–8 cycles of 134°C steam sterilization, leading to a gradual decline in IP68 waterproof performance. Therefore, it is only suitable for scenarios with ≤5 reuse cycles and cannot meet the requirements of conventional medical endoscopes that need to be reused more than 30 times.

IV. Core Trade-Off Logic: Aligning "Scenario Needs" with Module Parameters

As illustrated by the OCHFA10 case, the choice between using and not using a steel shell is essentially a match between "scenario needs" and "module parameters," rather than an absolute "superior or inferior" decision. It can be evaluated from four core dimensions:
From the perspective of reuse cycles: If the scenario requires ≥10 reuse cycles (e.g., conventional gastroscopes or reusable industrial inspection probes), the durability and sterilization stability of modules with steel shells are more suitable. If the module is disposable or used ≤5 times (e.g., single-use laryngoscopes or temporary pipeline inspections), the cost advantage of no steel shell is more prominent.
From the perspective of space constraints: If the probe diameter allows ≥2.5mm (e.g., adult bronchoscopes or industrial medium-diameter pipeline inspections), prioritizing the protective upgrade of a steel shell is feasible. If the probe diameter requires <2.5mm (e.g., coronary angioscopes or pediatric endoscopes), the ultimate compactness of no steel shell is a core prerequisite—otherwise, scenario adaptability is lost.
From the perspective of environmental wear intensity: If the application environment involves high wear (e.g., pipelines with burrs or friction in narrow body cavities), a steel shell can prevent module damage. If the environment is low-wear (e.g., semiconductor wafer inspections or smooth body cavity examinations), the protective shortcoming of no steel shell is negligible, allowing the module’s inherent advantages to be fully utilized.
From the perspective of cost sensitivity: For high-value reusable devices (e.g., high-end medical endoscopes), where minor cost increases are acceptable, the long-term benefits of a steel shell are more worthwhile. For cost-sensitive scenarios (e.g., disposable devices or mass-produced industrial inspection equipment), cost optimization without a steel shell is more suitable, reducing overall application costs.

V. Conclusion: Steel Shells Are "Enhancement Solutions," Not "Standard Configurations"

For endoscopic camera modules (like the OCHFA10) that combine medical-grade safety (sterilization compatibility, IP68 waterproof rating, biocompatibility) and ultra-compact size, the choice of a steel shell must return to the "essence of the application": if the scenario requires "long-term reusability and high environmental adaptability," a steel shell can maximize durability; if the scenario pursues "ultra-minimally invasive procedures and low-cost disposability," omitting the steel shell better leverages the module’s dimensional and power consumption advantages.
In the end, the choice of a steel shell for endoscopic camera modules is not a technical "either/or" decision, but a balance based on "parameter characteristics – scenario needs – cost objectives." Only by aligning the function of the steel shell with the core advantages of the module can the true value of the endoscope’s "visual core" be fully realized.

SincereFull Factory is a Leading high-tech enterprise in integrated optical device manufacturer and optical imaging system solution provider since 1992's foundation.

Contact Us

Phone: +86-17665309551
E-Mail: sales@cameramodule.cn
WhatsApp: +8617665309551
Skype: sales@sincerefirst.com
Address: 501, Building 1, No. 26, Guanyong Industrial Road, Guanyong Village, Shiqi Town

Quick Links

Applications

Keep In Touch With Us
​Copyright ©2024 Guangzhou Sincere Information Technology Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Privacy Policy